Souveraineté sur Pulau Ligitan et Pulau Sipadan (ZndonésielMalaisie), arrêt, C. I. J. found tlieir claims to the islands of Ligitan and Sipadan. Penelitian lebih lanjut mengenai masalah kepemilikan Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan membawa kasus ini ke Mahkamah Internasional adalah putusan politik . PENGARUH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP KASUS SIPADAN DAN LIGITAN DALAM PENERAPAN BATAS WILAYAH.
|Published (Last):||19 February 2009|
|PDF File Size:||14.71 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.75 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In the early days of bilateral relations, both countries experienced an era of confrontation in This research is kind of research literature study. Collections Skripsi Sarjana .
Government of the Philippines. Retrieved 7 February But, the decision of International court of justice does not have any direct barring to delimitation of continental shelf. The problem of this research is how the effect of International Court of Justice decision in case of Sipadan and Ligitan between Indonesia and Malaysia to forming national Law concerning regional boundary of the State.
Kasus Indonesia vs Malaysia by claudia hartono on Prezi
Territorial disputes in East, South, and Southeast Asia. The main data sources for this research came from Primary Data and Secondary Data. Which is where finally the judges of the International Court of Justice finally decided Sipadan and Ligitan Islands became the jurisdiction of Malaysia.
This is confirmed in the Report of International Court of Justice August 1 to July 31,the decision of the International Court of Justice conducted through bargaining or bargaining led by the presiding judge Gilbert Guillaume of France who determined Malaysia has sovereignty over Sipadan and Ligitan islands. Ligitan and Sipadan are two small islands located in the Celebes Sea off the southeastern coast of the Malaysian state of Sabah. Retrieved from ” https: Metadata Show full item record.
Archived from the original on 5 March Thesis S1 Uncontrolled Keywords: More information and software credits. Both of the islands were originally considered as terra nullius. What it is and how it Works. Text Bab I 1HK International Court of Justice cases Territorial disputes of Indonesia Territorial disputes of Malaysia Islands of Sabah in case law in Indonesia in Malaysia Indonesia—Malaysia border Indonesia—Malaysia relations in international relations.
Malaysia however denied the dam of an agreement between them, maintaining that the islands have always been part of the territory of its state of Sabah.
ICJ awarded both islands to Malaysia based on “effective occupation”.
Ligitan and Sipadan dispute
Divided among multiple claimants. The Philippines query was totally dismissed in June when after oral hearings the court voted it down by a count of fourteen votes to one. Moreover, for data analysis the writer use descriptive qualitative.
Sources of data used in this study are secondary pigitan, obtained through books, internet sites, journals, and others related to this research. Archived from the original on 7 February The reason for this inappropriate of Regional boundary of the State Law because the existence of Sipadan and Ligitan island which become the basic decision in drawing the main baseline used as guidance to specify regional boundary of Indonesia are now belong to Malaysia.
Sovereignty over Ligitan and Ligtan Islands Indonesia v. Some features of this site may not work without it. But with a far-sighted vision, leaders of both countries have taken a wise stance to immediately restore relations and even pioneered the establishment of the ASEAN regional organization in EngvarB from February Use dmy dates from February kashs This research is a type of qualitative research using descriptive method.
The court strongly rejected the Philippines’ attempt of intervention and in doing so cited that the request made by the Philippines did not relate to the subject matter of the case.